Hájek What Are Degrees of Belief ?

نویسندگان

  • Lina Eriksson
  • Alan Hájek
  • Branden Fitelson
چکیده

Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a rational agent obey the probability calculus. Correspondingly, a natural way to argue for probabilism is: i) to give an account of what degrees of belief are,

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Lina Eriksson Alan Hájek What Are Degrees of Belief ?

Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a rational agent obey the probability calculus. Correspondingly, a natural way to argue for probabilism is: i) to give an account of what degrees of belief are,

متن کامل

What Are Degrees of Belief?

Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a rational agent obey the probability calculus. Correspondingly, a natural way to argue for probabilism is: i) to give an account of what degrees of belief are, and then ii) to show that those things should be probabilities, on pain of irrationality. Most of...

متن کامل

Ten claims about fuzzy logic

3. Distinguish between fuzziness as impreciseness (vagueness) and uncertainty as beliefs. The former deals with degrees of truth, the latter with degrees of (un) certainty. The main reason consists in the following: FL may be (and mostly is) truthfunctional; logics of belief are not. FL is a many-valued logic, logic of belief is a kind of modal logic. Caution: non-truth functional FLn is also p...

متن کامل

From Degrees of Belief to Beliefs: Lessons from Judgment-Aggregation Theory

What is the relationship between degrees of belief and (all-or-nothing) beliefs? Can the latter be expressed as a function of the former, without running into paradoxes? We reassess this “belief-binarization” problem from the perspective of judgmentaggregation theory. Although some similarities between belief binarization and judgment aggregation have been noted before, the literature contains ...

متن کامل

A Co-inductive Language and Truth Degrees

We investigate what happens if PA LTr2, a co-inductive language, formalizes itself. We analyze the truth concept in fuzzy logics by formalizing truth degree theory in the framework of truth theories in fuzzy logics. Hájek-Paris-Shepherdson’s paradox [HPS00] involves that so called truth degrees do not represent the degrees of truthhood (defined by the truth predicate) correctly in Lukasiewicz i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007